2025-11-20//OPINION
AI: Hype vs Real (The Brownfield Reality)
It's 2025. We were promised flying cars, or at least a cure for the common cold. Instead, we got LLMs that can write Shakespearean sonnets about toaster ovens but can't center a div without hallucinating a new CSS property.
The industry is in a weird place. Everyone is an "AI Engineer" now. You have juniors who have never debugged a race condition because they just paste the error into the chat window and pray. They treat the model like an oracle, not a tool. And the code? It's soulless. It works, mostly, but it lacks the intentionality of a human mind that understands the *system*, not just the *syntax*.
And don't get me started on the "Greenfield Fallacy". All these demos, all these tutorials—they're always on fresh, clean codebases. "Look how easy it is to build a ToDo app with AI!" Yeah, great. Now try pointing that same model at a 7-year-old monolith written in a mix of Java 8 and spaghetti logic, where the variable names are in three different languages and the documentation is a sticky note from a guy named Dave who retired in 2019.
That's the reality. That's Brownfield. In the Brownfield, AI isn't a wizard; it's a confused intern. It suggests refactors that break six layers of dependency injection. It tries to modernize code that is load-bearing for reasons no one remembers. It doesn't know the *history*.
We're drowning in generated noise. The signal-to-noise ratio of the internet has plummeted. And we're doing it to ourselves. We're optimizing for velocity, not quality. We're building technical debt at the speed of light.
So yeah, use the tools. I use them. But for the love of root, stop trusting them blindly. Learn the fundamentals. Understand the memory model. Read the docs, not just the summary. Because when the model hallucinates, and it will, *you* are the one who has to fix it. And if you don't know how the machine works, you're just a passenger in a car with no driver, speeding towards a segfault.